AI · AI Engineering

GenAI APIs & Backend Integration

GenAI APIs and backend integration is the engineering of the production LLM layer inside an existing product — model routing, auth, rate limits, fallback paths, cost controls, and observability. The work starts where most LLM features fail: a single provider, no cost visibility, no per-tenant isolation, no eval harness. We engineer LLM integration for products that need AI without losing what works. Senior engineers own the build, India + global delivery.

In short

What is GenAI APIs & Backend Integration?

GenAI APIs and backend integration is an engineering engagement that hardens the production LLM layer inside an existing product - gateway, model routing, rate limits, fallback, observability, and evaluation. Builds typically ship in four to ten weeks. Senior engineers own the work end-to-end, delivered from India with global reach.

What we deliver

Concrete artefacts, not capabilities

  • 01

    Production LLM gateway routing across OpenAI, Anthropic, and open-weights providers

  • 02

    Per-tenant rate limits, cost ceilings, and audit logging enforced at the gateway

  • 03

    Streaming-aware integration in your product with fallback and retry paths

  • 04

    Observability - latency, error rate, cost, drift - wired into your existing dashboards

  • 05

    Eval harness covering your highest-traffic prompts and workflows

  • 06

    Runbook for incident response, model deprecation, and provider switching

How we work

Engagement phases

  1. Architecture and audit

    We review the existing LLM surface - provider choices, prompt code paths, error handling, cost trajectory, tenant isolation. Failure modes are catalogued: provider outages, model deprecation, rate-limit cascades, cost spikes, prompt injection. The architecture spec for the gateway, routing, and observability layer comes out of this phase, scoped to your stack and compliance posture.

  2. Gateway and routing

    We build the LLM gateway - a thin layer in your stack that handles auth, routing across providers, retries, fallbacks, and rate limits. Per-tenant ceilings are enforced at the gateway, not in application code. Streaming, structured outputs, and tool calling work uniformly across providers so application code does not branch per model.

  3. Observability and evals

    Latency, error rate, cost, and drift land in your existing observability stack - Datadog, Sentry, or whatever you already operate. The evaluation harness covers your highest-traffic prompts and workflows, runs in CI, and gates production deploys. Cost trends are tracked per tenant and per workflow so finance gets live visibility, not surprise invoices.

  4. Rollout and handover

    The gateway rolls out behind a feature flag, with traffic shifted incrementally from the legacy path. We close the engagement with documentation, a runbook covering model deprecation and provider switching, and three weeks of co-maintenance. Existing AI features keep shipping throughout; the integration work happens around them, not as a stop-the-world rewrite.

Tech stack

What we build on

  • OpenAIModels
  • AnthropicModels
  • Hugging FaceOpen-weights
  • Vercel AI SDKStreaming
  • DatadogObservability
  • SentryError tracking
  • PostgreSQLAudit logs
  • RedisRate limits
  • OpenAIModels
  • AnthropicModels
  • Hugging FaceOpen-weights
  • Vercel AI SDKStreaming
  • DatadogObservability
  • SentryError tracking
  • PostgreSQLAudit logs
  • RedisRate limits

Scope

When this fits and when it doesn't

When this engagement fits and when it does not.
This fits whenThis doesn't fit when
You have a product already shipping LLM features and the cost or reliability is breaking down.You do not have an existing product yet - start with a build engagement, not an integration one.
You need fallback across providers because uptime, latency, or pricing is hitting your roadmap.You want a brand-new copilot or agent - that is a different leaf with its own scoped engagement.
Your team needs per-tenant cost and rate-limit visibility before scaling traffic up further.You expect the integration to fix poor model selection or untuned prompts on its own - it will not.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Single-provider products fail in three ways - outages, deprecation, and cost. Routing across OpenAI, Anthropic, and open-weights gives you a fallback path when a provider has an incident, a migration path when a model is deprecated, and pricing leverage as the market shifts. The gateway makes provider choice an operational lever, not a code change.

Got a project in mind?

Tell us what you are building.

We build what large agencies under-deliver and freelancers can't architect, across Web3 protocols, AI agents, and SaaS products. Tell us what you are building. We will tell you how we would approach it, no pitch deck, no fluff, no commitment required.

Start a conversation
Reply within 12hNo pitch deck. No commitment.contact@metaborong.com